Boys and their boots (and hats) ...

[veronica_rich]

My penchant for wanting to discuss symbolism does sometimes overextend my grasp; I'll admit that upfront. But there's something I wanted to bring up based on a DMC discussion I saw in a subset of someone else's REALLY GOOD LJ discussion (it's in the one about the dice, for anyone who's heard of/read that one).



I'll try to be brief. There's a discussion in the comments section of the dice post - http://community.livejournal.com/triskaideka____/16644.html?thread=145156#t145156 - wherein we discuss the symbolistic importance of hats in the POTC movies. It's pretty much a given that Jack's hat is his power source. *G*

But metalkatt and I were discussing this earlier, and I told her it occurred to me that hats didn't work for all the characters (I'm just dealing with the major ones here, because at 3 am, any more than that would induce a migraine. Please feel free to add your own 2 cents in the comments, though, about anyone you like). Let's look at Will and James, specifically.

Will really advances as a character in DMC. He learns how to cheat to get what he needs (using the dice game as disguise for his real motive, hardly "honorable" in his old world), how to square more with adversity, how to deal with Jack and accept the consequences for not getting *enough* information from Jack (witness how when Elizabeth finds out Jack lied to her, she gets pissed off, but Will simply calls him on it and lets it drop as if he expects no less). But at the beginning of the movie, when he's actually wearing a hat - the only time he is - he is arrested and shackled and led to Beckett.

This scene annoys me. Will seems so ... impotent here. He doesn't struggle physically as much as he should. Elizabeth's demand for the charges is more forceful and badass, while Will just sort of stands there - I don't mean because he's the man he should be louder or angrier, I mean WILL HAS A TEMPER and we've seen it. Frankly, if this were the first time I were ever seeing Will Turner in action, I would be underwhelmed with both character and actor.

I've always contended that Bloom's not a wooden actor, he just tends to underplay rather than overdramatize, and a lot of viewers don't appreciate or see need for the difference. And it occured to me that may be the case here, too (of course, direction helps, but an actor's gotta be able to pull it off and if my meta is right, he does).

Notice that Will doesn't act like this in the rest of the movie. Once he leaves the jail, he takes charge, tracking Jack down himself, taking risks, going into strange places, getting the crew out of trouble and ultimately, off the Pelegostos island. His attitude isn't the same, either - he's confident once he manages to get Jack on the Pearl and make demands. He's not even as impotent on board the Flying Dutchman as he was in his wedding coat and hat, not even when he's being physically whipped. And, while deferential to Tia Dalma's mystical powers, he's not hesitant in the way that Gibbs and the other pirates are.

In other words, there is Will Turner in this movie, and there is William Turner - and I don't mean son and father. ;-)

Anyway, if a hat isn't Will's power here, what is? metalkatt says it's the boots. She also pointed out James has the boots, too, and they seem to be better for him than his hat, as well. (Come to think of it, EVERYONE in this movie has pirate boots.) Throughout the first movie, James had his hat and wig, and he never seemed really in charge as he should've. When he rescues Will, it's at Elizabeth's wheedling; he doesn't get to defeat the undead pirates until they're mortal, thanks to Jack and Will; he doesn't even get to hang his captive, because of Will's, Elizabeth's, and Swann's interference. In DMC, he's buffeted about when we first see him, staggering here and there or being led about. But once he's free of his wig, he's free to comment on absolutely anything. He fights for himself, he seizes the chance to steal the two Power Objects in the movie (heart and letter of marque), AND he manages to trick his way away from Jones's crew with none the wiser. (metalkatt wants to know why the hell he'd want to go back to his hatted, bewigged life, if he does so much better without them, and I'm inclined to wonder, as well.)

Thoughts?

Comments

[heartofslash.livejournal.com]

So... if hats make one impotent, or at least less-in-control-of-one's-destiny, then if Jack had not spent so much time in Tortuga finding a hat that appealed to him during the giant bar brawl, he might not be in the belly of the beastie?

Just asking...

[veronica-rich.livejournal.com]

No, that's not what I mean. For Jack (and if you follow that link, it talks more in detail about the hat thing), the hat IS a power thing; for Will, it's not. I'm not sure why this is, but there are just characters that seem to fall into an "is" or "isn't" category. For example, Liz does pretty well with a hat, just like Jack does, but Norrington does not. (Maybe this gives credence to "opposites attract" for a J/W pairing and a N/E one, eh? LOL)