veronica_rich: (liberal Jesus)
[personal profile] veronica_rich
California Rep. Jackie Speier blasts House Republican colleagues for anti-woman cuts to Planned Parenthood

Make no mistake; the GOP leadership in this country has declared war on women - their choices, their bodies, their liberties, and them personally. All these anti-choice and pro-rape proposals are not in any way intended to preserve the the safety of children, or the sanctity of life, or any such nonsense. Notice that you see ABSOLUTELY NO BILLS OR POLICIES BEING PROPOSED TO POLICE MEN'S REPRODUCTIVE (AND IN TURN, FINANCIAL) HEALTH OR CHOICES. Ergo, the logical Holmesian conclusion is that this is all aimed at women. Further, it's aimed at encouraging their early deaths by limiting screenings for cancer, STDs, problems with wanted pregnancies, and denying them affordable birth control options.

In addition, it's only cutting off legal venues for abortion - there is nothing in history that suggests that if legal abortion is unavailable, all women will forego a procedure altogether. They will not. Many will die, along with their unwanted fetus. And as for women who need an abortion on a wanted pregnancy to save their own lives? You've effectively just told them that they are worth less than an unformed blob of undelivered cells, not to mention adding to the pain and suffering they're already enduring by having to need this procedure in the first place.

Behold this awesome video:



Or, you can read it here:

Dem Rep. Jackie Speier reveals abortion story on House floor
Posted by Lucy Madison/CBSnews.com
February 18, 2011 UPDATED: 2:17PM ET

House debate over Republican proposals to cut millions of dollars in funding for family planning programs became emotional on Thursday night, when one Democratic congresswoman spoke about her own experience with abortion.

The proposal in question, proposed by Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), would cut all federal funding for Planned Parenthood. It would also entirely eliminate of a program known as Title X, which provides more than $300 million in aid for family planning and reproductive health, much of which is directed toward low-income families.

During the course of the three-hour debate, which lasted late into the night, more than 30 House members voiced their thoughts on the issue - but the chamber floor fell silent when Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) spoke about her own experience with abortion.

Noting that she had originally intended to address a different topic, Speier said she was driven to share her own perspective after hearing the remarks of Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), who for five minutes read graphic passages of a book in which a woman describes the experience of having an abortion.

"I really planned to speak about something else but the gentleman from New Jersey just put my stomach in knots because I'm one of those women he spoke about just now," Speier said. "I had a procedure at 17 weeks pregnant with a child who moved from the vagina into the cervix. And that procedure that you just described is a procedure that I endured."

"I lost the baby," she continued. "And for you to stand on this floor and suggest that somehow this is a procedure that is either welcomed or done cavalierly or done without any thought, is preposterous."

Speier went on to call the proposal a "vendetta" against Planned Parenthood.

"Planned Parenthood has a right to operate. Planned Parenthood has a right to provide services for family planning. Planned Parenthood has a right to offer abortions," she argued. "Last time I checked, abortions were legal in this country."

Pence, a fervent opponent of abortion rights who was at one time thought to be a potential 2012 presidential contender (he recently announced his decision not to run), referenced during his remarks a video depicting a Planned Parenthood employee giving advice to a couple posing as a pimp and a prostitute. (The video was produced by an anti-abortion group as a part of an undercover sting operation.)

"As the father of two teenage daughters, there are not words strong enough to portray my contempt of this pattern of apparent fraud and abuse by Planned Parenthood," Pence said.

Abortion rights advocates have called the proposal a "war against women" and argue that federal law already prohibits the expenditure of funds toward providing abortions. According to the New York Times, Planned Parenthood currently receives more than $75 million a year from the federal government to provide family planning and sex education services largely to low-income women.

Congress, however, has long since banned the use of federal funds for abortions.

"By targeting Planned Parenthood, the Pence Amendment will risk the lives and safety of millions of American women," said New York Democrat Louise Slaughter. "These proposed cuts to family planning represent the opening salvo in an all-out war on women's health - and I have been a soldier on the other side of that war for several decades."

She added that "It has been an absolute awful time for most of us who are such strong believers in the rights of women and women's health, and that women should have the ability to make decisions themselves."

Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, wrote in an email earlier this week that Pence's proposal was "the most dangerous legislative assault on women's health in Planned Parenthood's 95-year history," the Times reports.

Democratic New York Rep. Jerry Nadler called the amendment a "bill of attainder" and argued it was a "war against women," according to the Hill.

"I hear that we must punish Planned Parenthood by defunding them because they've committed a number of sins; sin No. 1, they are large abortion providers, even though none of those abortions are paid for by the federal government," Nadler said.

In later remarks, Republican Rep. Louis Gohmert, of Texas, disputed this assessment.

"No one is being found guilty of a crime here, I know about those things," he said, referring to the definition of a bill of attainder, which doles out punishment for a crime that has not received a trial.

"I know the gentleman is one of the smartest people I know but this is not a bill of attainder."

The amendment, which will head to the Senate upon its expected passage in the House, will likely face difficulty in the Democratically-controlled chamber.

Update: In a vote of 240 to 185, with one Congress member voting "present," the House on Friday voted to pass the Pence Amendment. The bill will now move to the Senate.

Date: 2011-02-19 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beldar.livejournal.com
Functionally, it's a bill of attainder, as none of PPI's other actions annoy Mr. Pence. He and his allies have made it perfectly clear that their objections rest on the organization being an abortion provider. One can only argue that it's not such a bill on the basis that it doesn't fine or otherwise sanction PPI, but that's splitting hairs.

I saw the video earlier. Anti-abortion politicians love to talk in general terms about unnamed sluts getting procedures, in their minds, for the fun of it; I bet they never suspected they were talking about one of their own.

Date: 2011-02-19 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
I wish I'd saved a copy of the e-mail I sent Pence recently about the rape-definition bill; it wasn't emotional. It addressed the potential legal problems (as I was a paralegal for almost six years, and I've covered courts for many years, so I wasn't talking out of my ass) more than anything else. I got the most patronizing, dismissive form e-mail reply you've ever seen in your life. I even saved it - if I see you soon, I'll show it to you on the iPhone. It's quite a piece of work.

Date: 2011-02-19 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metalkatt.livejournal.com
Check your sent items folder.

Date: 2011-02-19 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
It was an online form I filled out; I didn't send it out of my e-mail directly.

Date: 2011-02-19 02:47 am (UTC)

Date: 2011-02-19 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bonnie-halfelvn.livejournal.com
Thanks for sharing this!

Pence seems to like to lend his expertise on things about which he knows nothing.

Date: 2011-02-21 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
He's a man, he's white, and he's with the wingnut Republican niche. That makes him an expert on all things.

Date: 2011-02-19 04:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir8fancier.livejournal.com
I try to take solace that this will hand Obama the election in 2012.

Date: 2011-02-19 05:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] finding-neo.livejournal.com
Doesn't Obama have to sign this for it to be enacted? Or is it part of their budget package?

I would really like for everything the Tea Party and Republicans think is best for Americans to be visited upon them 10 fold. Just like their precious Bible says.

Date: 2011-02-19 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir8fancier.livejournal.com
It will never pass the Democratically controlled Senate and would certainly be vetoed by Obama, but that's precisely why they did this (aside from the religious zealots). It's a vote that panders to the extreme wing. The Republican party already has huge issues with the women in their electorate. It seems that they've decided that women aren't important compared to the religious and fiscal zealots. If Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden exchange roles in the next election (which I think will happen because Joe Biden is competent but the guy can's open his mouth without some gaff), then the Repubs are toast. Because Hillary will sew up the "woman" vote and with Obama's recent lurch to the center right, well, it's all over. And the Repubs know that. Notice there's no decent or viable candidate in the ring yet. No one wants to run against Obama in 2012. The economy is only getting better every month (although a drop in those unemployment statistics would be nice), and the shenanigans in the states with Repub politicians trying to end collective bargaining agreements will only incite anyone with any Labor affiliation to go Dem in 2012. It's like the Repubs are trying to commit political suicide.

Date: 2011-02-21 09:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
I think it will be visited upon them. Unfortunately, they're going to take the rest of us who don't agree, down with them.

Date: 2011-02-21 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
Don't bet on it. Things aren't any different with Obama now than they were four months ago, and look at how Republicans took over the House after only two years of him (contrasted with the eight years of GOP extremism before that).

Date: 2011-02-21 09:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir8fancier.livejournal.com
I disagree. I think that the rank and file of Republicans are fairly middle of the road, which is why I think Obama is pulling a Clinton and staking out the middle. You can talk a lot of this shit, but when it comes down these extremists starting to actually affect policies and agenda that hit close to home (not just the behind closed door machinations of Cheney's destruction of the Constitution), then people will start waking up. It's AFFECTING them now. Look at Wisconsin. This has completely energized labor. In the rural counties of Northern California that depend on national television getting their budget cuts is catastrophic. Our local PBS station will survive. Up in the north around Redding where their congressman voted to slash public television's funding, he's not so popular right now. In fact, it may cost him his seat. And their vote to kill funding for Planned Parenthood. KILLED the women's vote except for extremists like Bachmann. Planned Parenthood is NOT ALL about abortions. The Repubs wish it were, but it's not.

Date: 2011-02-19 05:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sirriamnis.livejournal.com
A friend posted this and some dipshit on her facebook replies, with, "Well, why would she ever think it was appropriate to talk about that in congress?"

*head/desk/repeat*

Date: 2011-02-19 05:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
No, I agree with them. Why is it appropriate to debate ANY of this in Congress? I thought they were supposed to be looking at job creation, not your fucking uterus or my goddamn ovaries.

Date: 2011-02-19 06:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sirriamnis.livejournal.com
Yeah... But that's not how he meant it.

Profile

veronica_rich: (Default)
veronica_rich

October 2020

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 06:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios