What about Norrington?
Dec. 16th, 2007 03:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So Nat and I were discussing when "Sweeney Todd" hits theaters and I said someone had told me it's this Friday, and that they remember because it's a big day for movies in general - "National Treasure 2" is coming out, as well. I was telling Nat about NT1, which she hadn't seen, and pointed out the idea actually lends itself to sequels since it's all about treasure-hunting, which is a bottomless vat of possibilities - one does not have to resort to crap B storylines of romantic triangles to have a good time presenting such a story. (I mention this because NT2 is another Ted-n-Terry spectacular - although I have to say, Bruckheimer may have finally learned the best way to use them: As idea guys, and not leave them to write the entire thing, unsupervised. There are separate writers to do the actual work of writing, and the Twins are only credited with the "story.")
Anyway, this is how we got to a discussion of the B storyline in DMC, and while I may not be the first person to ever have this idea, I have to say I haven't seen it anywhere else: Why not Norrington instead of Jack, to be the romantic foil for Will and Elizabeth? The whole purpose of the hinted J/E thing was to make Will's life harder and set up the end of AWE. Okay ... but wouldn't he have also been just as easy to make suspicious of another man by USING another man besides Jack? Think about it. The nice things about writing Norrington in this capacity are:
(a) it would have given him more screentime;
(b) Norrington as Elizabeth's suitor actually makes sense, whereas at least half of us were going When did Jack EVER show interest in her in CotBP, other than when he was in his cups and depressed anyway?;
(c) Elizabeth herself would've been more understandable, since there was presumably a time she would have actually thought of Norrington in that capacity, whereas that same half of us were also going When did she EVER show interest in Jack in CotBP, other than when she feigned to get him drunker so she could set a fire to get off the island to save Will? - to me, it makes more sense to suddenly regain an interest in a former suitor because he's now "mad, bad, and dangerous to know," as Norrington becomes in DMC. This also has the added bonus of both painting Elizabeth as "complex" in DMC (because I have learned from my fellow fans that a woman is only complex if she wants to get busy with at least two different men at the same time) and showing that maybe - just maybe - she wasn't entirely using Norrington in CotBP and actually did like the guy somewhat;
(d) Norrington picking a fight with Will on the waterwheel in DMC would ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE;
(e) when Norrington absconds with the heart toward Beckett, it actually sets up a better situation for Elizabeth to be angry and bitching at him in AWE, as well as making sense of the whole kiss and "dying to protect her" thing; and
(f) when Elizabeth does kiss Jack to distract him at the end of DMC, because he was a coward and sold Will out to Jones, it would actually come as a surprise to Jack and therefore, still be effective to get him chained up. Not to mention, Elizabeth wouldn't come off as scuzzy for practically giving Jack a lapdance earlier in the movie and THEN sending him to the depths for another man. EWWWW.
Now I can already hear the Norrington fans on my f-list. "Why?" you are saying. "WHY would you punish the poor man so? Hasn't he suffered enough?" Well, if he has to suffer anyway, wouldn't it be nice to see some consistency to it AND feel like Elizabeth actually saw him as a real guy and not just one of her stepping blocks toward Will?
(EDIT: Yes, I am this bored. I had things that needed to be done today and at least two of them have been effectively nixed by the foot of snow that fell. Am not happy with it.)
Anyway, this is how we got to a discussion of the B storyline in DMC, and while I may not be the first person to ever have this idea, I have to say I haven't seen it anywhere else: Why not Norrington instead of Jack, to be the romantic foil for Will and Elizabeth? The whole purpose of the hinted J/E thing was to make Will's life harder and set up the end of AWE. Okay ... but wouldn't he have also been just as easy to make suspicious of another man by USING another man besides Jack? Think about it. The nice things about writing Norrington in this capacity are:
(a) it would have given him more screentime;
(b) Norrington as Elizabeth's suitor actually makes sense, whereas at least half of us were going When did Jack EVER show interest in her in CotBP, other than when he was in his cups and depressed anyway?;
(c) Elizabeth herself would've been more understandable, since there was presumably a time she would have actually thought of Norrington in that capacity, whereas that same half of us were also going When did she EVER show interest in Jack in CotBP, other than when she feigned to get him drunker so she could set a fire to get off the island to save Will? - to me, it makes more sense to suddenly regain an interest in a former suitor because he's now "mad, bad, and dangerous to know," as Norrington becomes in DMC. This also has the added bonus of both painting Elizabeth as "complex" in DMC (because I have learned from my fellow fans that a woman is only complex if she wants to get busy with at least two different men at the same time) and showing that maybe - just maybe - she wasn't entirely using Norrington in CotBP and actually did like the guy somewhat;
(d) Norrington picking a fight with Will on the waterwheel in DMC would ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE;
(e) when Norrington absconds with the heart toward Beckett, it actually sets up a better situation for Elizabeth to be angry and bitching at him in AWE, as well as making sense of the whole kiss and "dying to protect her" thing; and
(f) when Elizabeth does kiss Jack to distract him at the end of DMC, because he was a coward and sold Will out to Jones, it would actually come as a surprise to Jack and therefore, still be effective to get him chained up. Not to mention, Elizabeth wouldn't come off as scuzzy for practically giving Jack a lapdance earlier in the movie and THEN sending him to the depths for another man. EWWWW.
Now I can already hear the Norrington fans on my f-list. "Why?" you are saying. "WHY would you punish the poor man so? Hasn't he suffered enough?" Well, if he has to suffer anyway, wouldn't it be nice to see some consistency to it AND feel like Elizabeth actually saw him as a real guy and not just one of her stepping blocks toward Will?
(EDIT: Yes, I am this bored. I had things that needed to be done today and at least two of them have been effectively nixed by the foot of snow that fell. Am not happy with it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 09:13 pm (UTC)But don't forget...Keira wanted to kiss Johnny and we must keep her happy. Not to mention all of the crazy fans. *eyeroll*
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 09:42 pm (UTC)However, I'm pretty sure the main reason was to give the title hero a girl. At least a little bit; and one that doesn't have black sails ;)
Also, wasn't it YOU with the anti-slash plot device icon? I wager Johnny's comments made Jack a touch too swishy for Disney's comfort, so what better solution than to throw the girl at him?
Last, you must not forget that there is a mission to give Norrington the least screen time possible. He may play a definite key role in DMC, but let's cut all his scenes that aren't 100% central, and even some of those. I'm pretty sure that in all three movies, but definitely DMC, he was the character were, in relation to the screentime he then ended up getting, the most material ended up on the cutting floor. /end sarcastic growl
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 05:31 pm (UTC)On an in-depth, character related analysis, Norrington makes more sense, but the shallow fangirlness "who would you throw yourself at" points to Johnny. At least for fangirls not as odd as moi ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 02:36 am (UTC)So how come Jack never fell into that role at any point? I mean, he sends the hero into danger to save his own skin, then tries to mack on his girlfriend, after all ...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 02:56 am (UTC)And whether they liked it or not, Disney isn't about to trash a
cash cowcharacter who became as popular as Jack Sparrow did.Though sending Will into Jones' clutches without telling him what he was getting into was pretty darn villain-like, IMHO.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:54 am (UTC)Also, because he's Johnny Depp :P
(Also, because the sequels do NOT follow the classical Disney pattern anymore at all.(after all, the ones with single parents require that parent not dying AND a happy end :P ) COTBP did.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 09:54 pm (UTC)I agree with all your points. If Elizabeth was suddenly taken with the idea of wanting to be with a "dangerous" man, wouldn't Norrington fit the bill perfectly? She already knows him, but now he's intriguingly fallen and seemingly disinterested in her. Seems like the hard-to-get angle would appeal to her as she wanted Will when he was unobtainable. Of course Jack's pretty unobtainable too, so that discredits my point.
I agree Jack shows no real interest in her in CotBP - I took his actions on the island as "Well, what else have I got to do? Might as well try to crack this nut."
It would have left Elizabeth torn between her original suitors, but it wouldn't have left her with a motive to retrieve Jack. I'm sure a bit of extra story-telling could have come up with something, though.
I was kind of confused by her vehemence toward James when they meet up in AWE. I understand she's upset by her father's death and the turn of events in general, but she's not a pirate (because presumably she and Will were going to return to Port Royal to live a quiet life) so I don't know why she takes his actions so personally. The whole deal with James seemed OOC and shoehorned in.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 03:05 am (UTC)And there's always word of mouth.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 07:57 pm (UTC)If you e-mail me your phone number, I can call tonight and we can discuss possibilities.
Or do you still have my celphone number from SitS1? If so you can call me. Remember I'm 2 hrs ahead of you, though, so I'd appreciate it if you didn't call after 8:30 or so your time.
VR's visiting her family for the holidays so I'm not sure how much free time she'll have to throw her $.02 in.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:08 pm (UTC):-P~~
Though, we could pimp it on cotbp_fandom ... and a bunch of other places, too ... or I could just abandon the new comm and we could work on "fandom" instead.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 09:34 pm (UTC)I'll subscribe as soon as I get home. Right now I'm "stealing" time on the office computer, which is technically Not Allowed.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:02 pm (UTC)Join it so I can make you a maintainer, savvy?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 08:02 pm (UTC)Join it so I can make you a maintainer, savvy?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 03:09 am (UTC)On the one hand, I, like you, would love to have my COTBP fire re-lighted so I could finish either "Point of Departure" or the James/Jack arc of Men Must Work (or both) but on the other I'm not sure there's enough spark left in the ashes to kindle even the most flammable tinder.
(OK, that analogy's been stretched enough.)
If we try it, worst thing that happens is it gets zero response and just sort of fades away, taking any hope of reviving the fandom in a form we'd want to rejoin with it.
How to do it, now...
It can't be a ficathon, because IIRC that's when you get story ideas/pairings/what have you assigned to you and have to write what you're given.
I suppose it would work as a challenge, though.
Or maybe a combination request/challenge? People can either request a WIP they want the author to finish, offer a COTBP story idea or a "fix" for DMC/AWE they'd like to read OR they can declare their intention to finish one of their WIPs, write a story idea they had but never worked up, or pick up one of the requests and run with that.
I think it'd need some sort of Comm, where people could talk about how it's going and buck each other up and generally encourage each other. We could call it COTBP_revival maybe? *G*
(I just checked; it's not taken yet.)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 05:35 am (UTC)But I also agree with everyone else: that was never going to happen - because they had to make their Big Name Leading Man their Leading Man (instead of their Character Actor), and that requires Getting The Girl, to some extent. (And as much as Liz's degeneration bothers me, the attempt to remake Jack Sparrow as a completely different class of character is just disgusting.)
The whole attempt to rewrite along the lines you've laid out here would make an excellent challenge for Norrie fans. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 04:59 pm (UTC)But, for me, it wouldn't matter who Elizabeth was flirting with on the 'Pearl', with Will in some peril over on the 'Dutchman', it's going to seem OOC for me. That just isn't the Elizabeth from CotBP.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 12:06 am (UTC)Norrington wasn't popular with the masses, I think the only reason he got as much screentime as he did was that the actor was so good.
I generally always try to be practical. There is always commercial pressure, and sometimes it seems like it must be almost unbearable, especially when you are at the helm of a movie this big, expected recoup such a huge financial investment, and are being pressured by the producer and the studio. With all the shit that was going on, it's a miracle that the movies are even watchable.
Norrington
Date: 2007-12-19 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 07:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-21 03:55 am (UTC)Like elessil I'm not a fan of the Norrington/Elizabeth pairing. In fact in the aftermath of DMC and AWE that is the one pairing which I totally dislike and find it hard to read; not even well written fan fiction.
I think that Veronica's original post sums up best why I can't stomach the Norrington/Elizabeth pairing past CoTBP. If the writers/Bruckheimer had shown that Elizabeth had any romantic thoughts about Norrington (however slight) or had at least treated him with a little more respect in the last two films (especially AWE) I would probably be more open to understanding how Norrington could possibly still have any feelings for her.
As it was AWE cemented my feelings regarding the Norrington/Elizabeth pairing. I found Norrington's final scene to be degrading, not at all romantic. It was as if he were begging for scraps of attention while Elizabeth glared, pouted and rolled her eyes at him. Even when she asked Norrington to "come with us, come with me" Elizabeth seemed to be doing her best imitation of a teenager who's parents had just confiscated her cellphone and IP3 player. Stone faced and sullen.
I'm not sure whether that was done on purpose or was a byproduct of how Keira Knightley chose to interpret that scene. According to the writers Elizabeth does care for Norrington as a friend and was horrified by his death but while that is supposedly canon it never truly came across in a believable way on screen. I remember being taken aback by how vicious Elizabeth was to James and disgusted that his reaction was the puppy dog eyes and simpering. Definitely a WTF? moment for me (one of many).
I agree with those who feel that using Norrington as the third piece of a triange in DMC would have made more sense when talking about the characterization and would have made his behaviour in AWE not as OOC and cringe inducing. And I probably would have been more open to the "goodbye" kiss. Of course it also might have helped if Elizabeth had first hugged then kissed James back rather than the one sided worship on his part.
But I also agree that the main reason why this wasn't done was because Jack Davenport isn't well known outside of Great Britain and the fangirls don't find him as attractive as Depp and Bloom.
I happen to find him just as gorgeous and sexy as Mr. Depp (which might be one of the shallow reasons why I love the Sparrington pairing). But as usual when it comes to the POTC fandom my opinions almost always tend to end up being in the minority.
I wrote too much but it's not good for me to start discussing the Norrington character; I tend to get carried away at times.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-21 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-20 01:17 am (UTC)I understand the reasons behind using Jack story/commercial-wise and DMC was fun, but the J/E did seem to come a bit out of the blue.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-21 04:46 am (UTC)