veronica_rich: (chimpenfuhrer)
[personal profile] veronica_rich
Found this article about a war protest in D.C. yesterday (text below the link too). I too would like to see us victorious anytime we march into war against another country, both for troop morale and safety - and because losing just makes us look bad. But it makes a difference, to me at least, that we go to war for the right reasons, and the only right reasons ever cited for this invasion on our part were trumped-up lies. I'm not in favor of us looking like a bunch of cowards by pulling out of a conflict, but I think there's a difference between fleeing right away and leaving after a too-long occupation and cutting your losses shorter than they could be (not to mention a healthy dose of saying "We're sorry; we fucked up" in some diplomatic fashion).

No, I was never in favor of this war, but I see a smidge of logic in some of the "we can't pull out!" side's argument - just not enough to agree with them at the continued expense of lives, our tax dollars, and our tarnished image around the world.


Thousands march in D.C. war protest
By MATTHEW BARAKAT, Associated Press Writer
Sept. 16, 2007

WASHINGTON - Several thousand anti-war demonstrators marched through downtown Washington on Saturday, clashing with police at the foot of the Capitol steps where more than 190 protesters were arrested.

The group marched from the White House to the Capitol to demand an end to the Iraq war. Their numbers stretched for blocks along Pennsylvania Avenue, and they held banners and signs and chanted, "What do we want? Troops out. When do we want it? Now."

Army veteran Justin Cliburn, 25, of Lawton, Okla., was among a contingent of Iraq veterans in attendance.

"We're occupying a people who do not want us there," Cliburn said of Iraq. "We're here to show that it isn't just a bunch of old hippies from the 60s who are against this war."

Counterprotesters lined the sidewalks behind metal barricades. There were some heated shouting matches between the two sides.

The arrests came after protesters lay down on the Capitol lawn in what they called a "die in" — with signs on top of their bodies to represent soldiers killed in Iraq. When police took no action, some of the protesters started climbing over a barricade at the foot of the Capitol steps.

Many were arrested without a struggle after they jumped over the waist-high barrier. But some grew angry as police with shields and riot gear attempted to push them back. At least two people were showered with chemical spray. Protesters responded by throwing signs and chanting: "Shame on you."

The number of arrests by Capitol Police on Saturday was much higher than previous anti-war rallies in Washington this year. Five people were arrested at a protest outside the Pentagon in March when they walked onto a bridge that had been closed off to accommodate the demonstration, then refused to leave. And at a rally in January, about 50 demonstrators blocked a street near the Capitol, but they were dispersed without arrests.

The protesters gathered earlier Saturday near the White House in Lafayette Park with signs saying "End the war now" and calling for President Bush's impeachment. The rally was organized by the ANSWER Coalition and other groups.

Organizers estimated that nearly 100,000 people attended the rally and march. That number could not be confirmed; police did not give their own estimate. A permit for the march obtained in advance by the ANSWER Coalition had projected 10,000.

Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan told the crowd is was time to be assertive.

"It's time to lay our bodies on the line and say we've had enough," she said. "It's time to shut this city down."

About 13 blocks away, nearly 1,000 counterprotesters gathered near the Washington Monument, frequently erupting in chants of "U-S-A" and waving American flags.

Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Robert "Buzz" Patterson, speaking from a stage to crowds clad in camouflage, American flag bandanas and Harley Davidson jackets, said he wanted to send three messages.

"Congress, quit playing games with our troops. Terrorists, we will find you and kill you," he said. "And to our troops, we're here for you, and we support you."


Associated Press writer Christine Simmons contributed to this report.

Date: 2007-09-16 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] araestel.livejournal.com
This administration has had its own agenda from day one. I don't believe one word that comes out of the shrubs mouth, nor anything said by any of his cronies. The harm they've done this country is appalling and disgusting. He should have been impeached years ago.

Date: 2007-09-16 10:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
Yeah, but you know, since he got in crookedly in the first place, there was never any real hope of him being ousted the honest way. Let's just hope he doesn't institute martial law and suspend elections late next year, as I fear is likely to happen ...

Date: 2007-09-17 12:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] araestel.livejournal.com
I wouldn't put anything past that loser. GRRRRRRRR

Date: 2007-09-17 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ainsoph15.livejournal.com
Oh god, roll on May. It can't come soon enough. Me and my friends have had a 'Bye-bye Bush' party planned for, well, years. There will be much champagne drunk on that happy night. We'll be celebrating until they elect the next gibbering idiot into office, of course.

I'd like to see Hilary Clinton as President, mainly out of idle curiousity over how they'll refer to Bill. Will he be the 'First Man'? There's just too much humour to be derived from the whole scenario! LOL!

Date: 2007-09-18 02:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
Where's that bye-bye Bush party? I'll be there!

Date: 2007-09-17 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] electrainverted.livejournal.com
(*is a lurker* :D *waves*)

Terrorists, we will find you and kill you

I'm just wondering, silently... what if they got in "reports" of "terrorists" in any European country, for example? Do the US government take their self-proclaimed bully mission to mean they can march into France, for example, if so? Slovakia? Italy? Denmark? Or is it only the Middle Eastern countries that can expect such treatment? Asia?

It just makes me wonder, how with how the government styles itself as warriors against "terrorism". (Where did that "duty" come from, anyway? I sure hope they won't come after any alleged terrorists if they found them supposedly making base in my country. =o )

Date: 2007-09-17 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
Well, do you have oil or any other plentiful, easily-mined, easily-marked-up and sold valuable resources in your country? If you do, you'd better look out! (What, you think you have to have actual *terrorists*?)

Date: 2007-09-17 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] electrainverted.livejournal.com
We have, uh... trees. Lots of trees! And iron ore. I suppose that counts? (Oh no! =( ) We've got pretty nature, too, but at least that can't be picked up and sold easily if you aren't going to destroy it. (I could hope for there to be actual terrorists in the reason, but I suppose that would be too much to ask! O_o ) I will have to hope our general geographical placement in line with Canada will keep us safe; it's too cold. And don't... um... there's the polar bears, too! Totally!

Profile

veronica_rich: (Default)
veronica_rich

October 2020

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 07:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios