(no subject)
Jul. 20th, 2006 03:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yes, more DMC discussion. But instead of bitching and moaning this time, I actually come bearing grand insight for writers on my f-list.
Let's start with a simple link - Jack Sparrow's supposed official, possible-canon history:
http://community.livejournal.com/potc_discussion/7277.html
(You can post comments to that list all you like, obviously, but I'd really love to see some discussion in this journal, as well.)
Some follow-up discussion at: http://xylodemon.livejournal.com/356621.html on the same topic, speculation, etc.
In short for you who are link-a-phobic: Someone found a spot on the official DMC site that references a possible backstory for Jack. He worked for Beckett and the East India Trading Company, and Pearl was a ship of its fleet. Jack defied a direct order/assignment and it was of such nature that it got the Pearl sunk/abandoned and Jack branded for piracy. Fan speculation includes Jack refusing something having to do with slaves; MY taking that further says that Jack delivered some slaves - only not to where he was supposed to, to collect money. Instead, he left them in someone's humane, free care (such as Tia Dalma's). It would explain why everyone in her bayou mourned his passing, why he was allowed there (even if she spooked Jack personally). It would also explain why Beckett would take his ship and brand him for piracy - Jack basically had embezzled from the company, taken cargo that was not his and denied his employers their coinage and the customers their shipment.
Again, remember that I'm just going off what someone else said they found on the site, and then adding other people's and then my own speculation on top of that. (For some perverse reason, this all makes my fiction-writer-plotter heart very joyous. You've gotta be a writer - and several of you are - to understand it.)
Remember Norrington's line to Gibbs: "My story is exactly the same as yours, just one chapter behind"? (Paraphrased.) Now, think about what drives Will Turner - right and good, but conscience above all else. If what I typed above about Jack turns out to be true, it would prove Jack also puts conscience above all else. And can't you imagine that if Will knew this real backstory on Jack, that it might be the hairsbreadth Will would need to turn HIM completely to a life of piracy - like Jack, to thwart the EITC?
I'll just write it out: Will Turner is Jack Sparrow, one chapter behind.
Oh, PLEASE, tell me what you think.
Let's start with a simple link - Jack Sparrow's supposed official, possible-canon history:
http://community.livejournal.com/potc_discussion/7277.html
(You can post comments to that list all you like, obviously, but I'd really love to see some discussion in this journal, as well.)
Some follow-up discussion at: http://xylodemon.livejournal.com/356621.html on the same topic, speculation, etc.
In short for you who are link-a-phobic: Someone found a spot on the official DMC site that references a possible backstory for Jack. He worked for Beckett and the East India Trading Company, and Pearl was a ship of its fleet. Jack defied a direct order/assignment and it was of such nature that it got the Pearl sunk/abandoned and Jack branded for piracy. Fan speculation includes Jack refusing something having to do with slaves; MY taking that further says that Jack delivered some slaves - only not to where he was supposed to, to collect money. Instead, he left them in someone's humane, free care (such as Tia Dalma's). It would explain why everyone in her bayou mourned his passing, why he was allowed there (even if she spooked Jack personally). It would also explain why Beckett would take his ship and brand him for piracy - Jack basically had embezzled from the company, taken cargo that was not his and denied his employers their coinage and the customers their shipment.
Again, remember that I'm just going off what someone else said they found on the site, and then adding other people's and then my own speculation on top of that. (For some perverse reason, this all makes my fiction-writer-plotter heart very joyous. You've gotta be a writer - and several of you are - to understand it.)
Remember Norrington's line to Gibbs: "My story is exactly the same as yours, just one chapter behind"? (Paraphrased.) Now, think about what drives Will Turner - right and good, but conscience above all else. If what I typed above about Jack turns out to be true, it would prove Jack also puts conscience above all else. And can't you imagine that if Will knew this real backstory on Jack, that it might be the hairsbreadth Will would need to turn HIM completely to a life of piracy - like Jack, to thwart the EITC?
I'll just write it out: Will Turner is Jack Sparrow, one chapter behind.
Oh, PLEASE, tell me what you think.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 07:49 am (UTC)*wonders why YOU aren't writing for the movies*
;)
btw...hi :) I don't think you know me, but I've been following your discussions (and of course I adore Will/Jack) so I thought I'd finally de-lurk and introduce myself. I'm now off to contemplate your theories and hopefully respond to your posts.
♥
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 07:52 am (UTC)Thanks for reading, and feel free to comment wherever in here!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 10:29 am (UTC)I did catch - in the film)- little things like Jack not telling Bootstraps that Will is not a pirate and the way Will commanded a ship (which gave me a huge smile).
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 02:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 12:03 pm (UTC)SQUEEEEEEEEE!
*feeling SO hopeful about part 3*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 12:31 pm (UTC)Anyhoo, sorry, topic at hand. Perfect! Just perfect! I love the way the writers keep inadvertently giving us fuel for our slashiest devices. Brilliant.
-G. ;D
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 02:18 pm (UTC)You got all that from the bones on the cages? Are you a doctor? ;-)
I got the feeling in that sequence that Jack really didn't have much control over the natives' details of what they did (hell, if he had, they wouldn't be eating HIM) unless it was what they wanted to do (such as imprisoning Will or adding more wood for "bigger fire!"). In fact, it took two viewings to understand that he didn't go there at all on purpose knowing what the island was - he was running scared and picked the first land he could find where there was no immediate danger of naval arrest. Once they all beached the Pearl for careening, they couldn't exactly hop back in it when the natives started coming, and row out to sea.
I love the way the writers keep inadvertently giving us fuel for our slashiest devices.
Oh, YES. I can definitely use this for Turrow.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 02:12 pm (UTC)Or perhaps you were referring to my very last comment about Will? *G*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 02:25 pm (UTC)Which would make the movies one step behing me.
Heh.
*demands that Djimon Hounsou be cast as the slave rebellion leader Matthew and that my friend Dave who was the inspiration for Alphonse DeMaurier be cast as Alphonse, and demands the filming must begin asap and the author MUST be present for ALL NC-17-rated scenes*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 02:29 pm (UTC)Is that where the slave-releasing came from in your story, that you had that idea about the Jack backstory? That's pretty cool if you deduced that THAT far ahead of the movie writers. I don't know why it didn't occur to me at some point, except that I freely admit I usually need a good kick in the ass for ideas to write. *G*
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 04:40 pm (UTC)This would make the discussions I have read elsewhere about POTC being racist very interesting as well.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 10:27 pm (UTC)What I wanna know is how Jack!daddy-Keith Richards factors into all of this. Besides wanting to know what Jack's "mark" on Bennett was. (I've been creeped out by Bennett's actor ever since his Mr.Collins in Pride and Prejudice, but I could smell the slash coming off that little implication in waves..)
I'm not sure about this Jack-being-sympathetic-to-native-cultures thing, but it does seem likely that for where he's (probably) been and all he's (probably) seen, Jack's not about to be at all Imperialist in his outlook on the various indigenous peoples of different lands. (We don't even rightly know what his ethnic heritage is in POTC canon.) But whatever his beliefs, I think Jack's nothing if not the sort of person who considers all circumstances on their individual terms--if the backstory above is to be believed, there were enslaved people right there and it was directly in his power to do something, and I can easily see the thought of taking them to where they were supposed to go not sitting well with Jack. So. Wow. He's cool.
I will say, though: Will Turner may well follow in Jack Sparrow's footsteps, but he'd better not be Jack Sparrow (one chapter behind or not), or else where would the fun be? T_T
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 10:47 pm (UTC)Yes, I'd really like to know where Pearl comes from. Is she Jack's ship? He was a fairly young guy when he raised her, let alone when he might've *lost* her before that. If it's HIS ship (and not the EITC's; maybe he was a private contractor?), he's too young to have bought it without family money, I'd think. Was it Dad's? If so, who IS Grant Sparrow? Is he legit, or a pirate, too?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 03:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 05:36 am (UTC)As for Will, he is a very black and white kind of guy, but I think he goes by his own moral barometre, that is, what he believes to be right. Will comes across as very self-reliant, and while he may follow conventions and rules, he will ignore them if they conflict with his own highly developed conscience. We saw this in COTBP. Early on, Pirates were bad, coloured, no doubt, by his own experience of being the only survivor of a pirate attack, during which he likely saw people he knew, and liked, killed. but in the end, he ignored the law to rescue Jack because his conscience dictated it. Even his relationship with Elizabeth can be seen in this light, society says he can't have her, but he once again ignores this, more social than moral, but there you have it.
As for turning to Piracy, it was ol' Papa Swan that pointed out that there was only one pardon. Will will undoubtedly need to resort to piracy further if he wants to clear his, and Elizabeth's, names, which really is a catch 22, even if he clears his name, many will still consider him a pirate.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 05:41 am (UTC)I doubt EITC will be pushed out of Port Royal, so at the end, Will and Elizabeth and Papa (if he survives) won't simply be able to go back to their normal lives, I'm afraid. You're most likely correct about any or all having to be lumped in with "pirates."
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 06:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 01:42 am (UTC)*hides a sniff*
Beautiful. It really is.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 02:50 pm (UTC)Jack, I feel, is actually pretty simple, at least in his wants. He wants his ship, the sea, an able crew, and some rum. It's his obtaining and/or keeping of those simple things in life, that makes Jack complicated. And part of Jacks appeal is that he's enigmatic enough to keep people guessing what exactally is going on in his head. I have visions of a thought bubble hovering over his head with a picture of mermaids while he's verbally sparring with Will. He's alternately under and over estimated.
And I've just re-read this and found it doesn't make much sense, but short of overhauling it all and making it even more convuluted than it already is, it at least gets the point across.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-23 07:36 am (UTC)I would add "and mermen" to that, too. He and I have that in common ...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 08:31 pm (UTC)Instead, he left them in someone's humane, free care (such as Tia Dalma's). It would explain why everyone in her bayou mourned his passing, why he was allowed there (even if she spooked Jack personally).
I flipping LOVE this theory. And I'd already been working myself on figuring out how the folks in the bayou fit into the grieving. I figured they had been helped in some way by Jack. I couldn't quite see them as "normal" friends... and certainly not former crewmen.
Actually adding onto your theory--what about Tia Dalma having been a part of the slave shipment? Perhaps there was even an early attraction to her that helped his decision is following his conscience as opposed to his require task.
Oh you make me want to write so many things! Ack! I'm totally getting buried under the hundreds of plot bunnies breeding for PotC and the Dead Zone. X_X And I still need to finish "Ocean Soul"! =p
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 04:43 am (UTC)Tia *might* have been a former slave, but she doesn't particularly strike me as such. I can't say why; I just don't *feel* it. I get the feeling she's always been free, or at least has always managed to hide well enough to remain that way. I like to think Jack met Tia through some way and remembered her when he decided to defy EITC and was looking for a way to stash his "cargo" instead of watching it be hauled off by a less scrupulous captain.
Write! Write my child!