Critics? Yeah, you. FUCK YOU.
Oct. 14th, 2005 11:00 pmhttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/elizabethtown/
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kingdom_of_heaven/
Now I could understand being wrong about one movie. But two? Sorry, guys - you're showing your Orlando prejudice. Give up, put the pens down, and go the fuck home. You lose at critical, thoughtful reviews. No longer will I let you put me on alert against an actor who happens to do a decent job. Go back to harassing Ben Affleck.
Yes, I saw both. Yes, I went in to each one with many trepidations, thinking they'd be disasters. Based on reviews. AND THEY WEREN'T. Dammit, anyhow.
EDIT:
For those who don't know me in real life, let me get this out of the way (and I know there's no way you can ask people who know me, yeah, but take my word for it): I do not like pretty actors. I generally go out of my way to avoid them, which is unfair at least some of the time, but there it is. I did not like Orlando Bloom at first because he was too good-looking - yes, it's all true. I mention this only so you realize I actually did go into each of the aforementioned films skeptical of what I would see, both in each movie and in his performances.
Let me also get this out of the way: I do not think Bloom is yet at the top of his game ... which is actually a Good Thing, since where can you possibly go if you peak at 28? At this age, all I really expect to see is the beginnings of real goodness in art, and the potential for much more focused work later on down the road. Do I get that from this guy? Yes. Do I think he needs to work more on his depth and range? Yes. But it's at least in there trying to come out - I just don't think he's old enough to "grab" it yet.
Drew Baylor is his own character. He is not a variation on Elf, or Blacksmith, or Baron, or Boxer, or Sailor. He is Drew, a depressed, messed-up, mostly-numb (but not completely!) fellow whose life is now as much shit as it ever was gold before. With various actors, I like to play Let's-Spot-Our-Favorite-Characters in scenes - you know, look for expressions and such that evoke past roles (as in, "Oh, there's Legolas!" or "Yep, that's Will"). I don't get that very much at all from this actor, perhaps because contrary to some critical dissertation, he actually does have a range of emotions.
This whole movie wasn't nearly as wandering or rambling as the critics make out. I don't fathom their incomprehension - can they really not keep up with subplots, and distinguish Plot A from Subplot B, C, and so forth? I think it's time to go back to high school for some Lit classes, if that's the case. Then again, maybe I just like complex storylines. I may have a difficult time writing and weaving so many storylines together, but I am capable of appreciating someone else's talent for doing so.
After seeing the trailers, I was a bit horrified by some of the dialogue; I won't lie, there are a few lines in the movie that just fall sort of flat. I also expected cloying syrup from Kirsten Dunst - not that I think she's bad, but the previews didn't give me hope. I want to admit this isn't the case. She's a particular kind of woman, sure, but if I met her in real life, I wouldn't try to choke her.
Alec Baldwin gets a GREAT 5-minute cameo. Susan Sarandon's is longer and not as punch-WHAM!, but I think she played the part as it was written.
Cameron Crowe may have done better movies - I still like "Almost Famous" just a *teensy* bit more for the subject matter and writing - but then again, I wasn't at all impressed with "Fast Times at Ridgemont High." Age has improved him, or at least expanded his horizons, as far as I can tell. The only thing I might have asked for in "Elizabethtown" was a little more darkness for the lead characters.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kingdom_of_heaven/
Now I could understand being wrong about one movie. But two? Sorry, guys - you're showing your Orlando prejudice. Give up, put the pens down, and go the fuck home. You lose at critical, thoughtful reviews. No longer will I let you put me on alert against an actor who happens to do a decent job. Go back to harassing Ben Affleck.
Yes, I saw both. Yes, I went in to each one with many trepidations, thinking they'd be disasters. Based on reviews. AND THEY WEREN'T. Dammit, anyhow.
EDIT:
For those who don't know me in real life, let me get this out of the way (and I know there's no way you can ask people who know me, yeah, but take my word for it): I do not like pretty actors. I generally go out of my way to avoid them, which is unfair at least some of the time, but there it is. I did not like Orlando Bloom at first because he was too good-looking - yes, it's all true. I mention this only so you realize I actually did go into each of the aforementioned films skeptical of what I would see, both in each movie and in his performances.
Let me also get this out of the way: I do not think Bloom is yet at the top of his game ... which is actually a Good Thing, since where can you possibly go if you peak at 28? At this age, all I really expect to see is the beginnings of real goodness in art, and the potential for much more focused work later on down the road. Do I get that from this guy? Yes. Do I think he needs to work more on his depth and range? Yes. But it's at least in there trying to come out - I just don't think he's old enough to "grab" it yet.
Drew Baylor is his own character. He is not a variation on Elf, or Blacksmith, or Baron, or Boxer, or Sailor. He is Drew, a depressed, messed-up, mostly-numb (but not completely!) fellow whose life is now as much shit as it ever was gold before. With various actors, I like to play Let's-Spot-Our-Favorite-Characters in scenes - you know, look for expressions and such that evoke past roles (as in, "Oh, there's Legolas!" or "Yep, that's Will"). I don't get that very much at all from this actor, perhaps because contrary to some critical dissertation, he actually does have a range of emotions.
This whole movie wasn't nearly as wandering or rambling as the critics make out. I don't fathom their incomprehension - can they really not keep up with subplots, and distinguish Plot A from Subplot B, C, and so forth? I think it's time to go back to high school for some Lit classes, if that's the case. Then again, maybe I just like complex storylines. I may have a difficult time writing and weaving so many storylines together, but I am capable of appreciating someone else's talent for doing so.
After seeing the trailers, I was a bit horrified by some of the dialogue; I won't lie, there are a few lines in the movie that just fall sort of flat. I also expected cloying syrup from Kirsten Dunst - not that I think she's bad, but the previews didn't give me hope. I want to admit this isn't the case. She's a particular kind of woman, sure, but if I met her in real life, I wouldn't try to choke her.
Alec Baldwin gets a GREAT 5-minute cameo. Susan Sarandon's is longer and not as punch-WHAM!, but I think she played the part as it was written.
Cameron Crowe may have done better movies - I still like "Almost Famous" just a *teensy* bit more for the subject matter and writing - but then again, I wasn't at all impressed with "Fast Times at Ridgemont High." Age has improved him, or at least expanded his horizons, as far as I can tell. The only thing I might have asked for in "Elizabethtown" was a little more darkness for the lead characters.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 04:52 am (UTC)Historically, my favorite actors haven't been classically attractive. Besides Michael J. Fox, I'd say Bloom is only the second actor in my life I've liked a lot who happens to also be popular. If he were just pretty but vapid, I wouldn't follow his career - in fact, I started out not particularly liking him because he was too good-looking. And I don't really care about his personality off-camera - Sean Penn is an asshole, or at least he used to be, but the man can ACT - so I don't use "well, he seems nice and gracious" to justify my like of him. I just like him; he has talent. He's not at the top of his game at 28 - big surprise! Where would he go if he were? (Gosh, look back at Johnny Depp at 28 - pretty, but not a lot to write the Academy about.)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:12 am (UTC)They crapped all over Elizabethtown, too.
Dorks.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:26 am (UTC)And, like you, I didn't like Orlando in the beginning. I couldn't like him and I just couldn't place my finger on why, but I didn't. He has grown on me during the last year or two, just as his talent has.
As for favorite actors that aren't very good looking, look up Christopher Eccleston. I think he is extremely attractive, but no one else I know does. I guess I'm weird. LOL
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:36 am (UTC)My whole point is that negativity really seems the attitude online anymore, where I'm reading pretty much all my movie reviews. So it sort of makes sense that these people would crap all over anything that shows some hope and isn't all gritty and nasty and negative.
NEWSFLASH: Real life is enough of a bitch. Sometimes, I just want to escape somewhere more pleasant and dream for a couple of hours. Why would I go into a theater and WANT to be reminded how suck it is once I walk back out?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:40 am (UTC)I see potential in young Orlando. If he keeps trying, it'll fight its way out.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:42 am (UTC)This is the one bad thing about online reviews: Every idiot with a computer and a modem who WANTS to fancy himself a critic, CAN.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:54 am (UTC)I'm really completely head-over-heels for Bloom. Old lady lust, but I can't help it. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 03:36 pm (UTC)In other news:
I completely agree about all the negatively online, but it has become a greater force in all of society, not just online. Does anyone enjoy living anymore? It's a very simple basic thing. Think about it - do you have a problem at this exact moment as you read these words? Are you infected with bird flu? No, you don't and no you are not. So why the complete and utter fascination with fates which may or may not befall us?
You know things are going to shit when a simple discussion of movie reviewers ellicits philosophy. LOL
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 03:36 pm (UTC)I'm with you that Griffin Dunne is a wonderful actor. I also like Fisher Stevens. Who didn't like "Short Circuit?!"
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:05 pm (UTC)Sure you can ... especially if you don't have that talent yourself, or the opportunity the guy has.
OB has said he doesn't read critics' reviews of his movies. I don't know how true that is; I'm pretty sure his publicist, at least, reads them. I was reading over at IMDB a comment from someone who was *so* very focused on finding something to bitch about that he criticized OB for this comment and was saying "how will he ever improve if he doesn't read these things?"
I will tell you right now, from 12 years as a journalist, that I have NEVER gained a damn positive-change thing from a critical reader that I didn't first/concurrently get from a fellow writer or editor. Now granted, I'm not the Johnny Depp of the journalism world ... but then again, I wonder how many of his critics The Depp has listened to, who haven't been actors/directors themselves. My point is, when I'm looking to improve my technique or style, I look to other writers - people who actually know the craft and how to work within it. And if Orlando wants to improve, he should look to other actors or directors to give him ideas - NOT the flake writing for killermovies.net.
As for the sex-symbol thing: How could that have been helped? He was cast in a fairly minor (dialogue-wise) role, and when I watch the first movie, I don't see him hamming up his time onscreen. If people noticed him, there must have been something about him TO notice, eh?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:11 pm (UTC)In other news:
MY personal negativity on a daily basis comes from never having enough money to pay off my long-term debts. Yeah, I don't like this country's politics right now, we're headed for some deep shit, et cetera - but those are long-range concerns that you can't dwell on 24/7. However, the money thing does worry me immediately. Funny thing is, though, I can't say I'm depressed most of the time ... 'cause I'm not. I suppose I have reasons to be, maybe, but other than lack of funds (and those damn politics), I don't know what they are at this very moment in time. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:36 pm (UTC)A lot of people think that you need to listen to all critics of your work and that isn't true. Listen to a comment made by someone who has done the exact work longer and then you will know if you need to work harder.
As for the sex symbol thing, I don't think he cares what people think of his looks. Orlando seems to be comfortable in his own skin. And, yes, there must have been something to notice, but I didn't see it with the blond wig.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 08:41 pm (UTC)I didn't read any reviews for KoH. Maybe if I had I wouldn't have been so shocked that it didn't do better at the US box office? I didn't really care for the ending - the movie felt unfinished - but most of it was excellent. (Hell, my husband liked it! That makes it a milestone in my Orlando!quest. :-p )
I have been reading reviews for Etown and they are making me nervous about it. No one has mentioned the accents, though. In watching the previews, I get stuck on both Orlando's and Kirsten's accents. And it might just be that I'm so used to hearing them in their own accents, that it's the actors that sound funny to me, not the characters (if that makes any sense). I usually have problems with a movie that puts non-Southerners in Southerner roles (because the actors usually suck at the accent).
So.... How were the accents?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 10:58 pm (UTC)Drew's character has spent most of his life in the Pacific Northwest, so he doesn't have a Southern accent, and he's not supposed to. It's quite modulated and well-enunciated, and as far as I'm concerned, I don't track any British traces in it, except just very occasionally a noise here and there - it's really not enough worth mentioning, honestly.
It's a good movie, honest. It's rambling, but everything does have a point. I've never seen a perfect movie, but this one makes me feel good, even when I cry at a couple of parts.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 11:02 pm (UTC)And my answer has always been, "Really? I never did. I have an English degree. I've learned everything I know by actually doing it."
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:07 am (UTC)Let me say first of all that I have loved Kristen Dunst ever since she did 'Interview with the Vampire'. In this movie she's so bubbly you want to bottle some of that for yourself. If I had to pick a character that was closest to Orlando's true self, it would be Drew. From being overwhelmed by all the attention his father's family gives him to his vulnerable side throughout the movie. So overwhelmed by that 'teeny' billion dollar mistake. I give the screenwriters credit, they certainly came up with an unique way for Drew to attempt suicide. Alec Baldwin, as in 'Aviator' makes the best of his short amount of screentime as Orlando's boss. Susan Sarandon as Orlando's mother also steals her scenes in the movie. And then there's 'Freebird'. Words fail to describe it completely, but hysterical is a good start. Orlando really shines in the last thirty minutes of this movie where he's driving home and stopping a different places along the way, talking to his dad, scattering his ashes in different places as he goes. Some funny, some touching and one that completely blew me away. Hint: U2. The only complaint I really had was the inconsistency in Orlando's accent, especially during the voiceover in the beginning.
It's a wonderful movie, funny and cute. Anyone who says it's a typical love story wasn't paying attention.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:04 am (UTC)-T
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:19 am (UTC)I'd like to say he should just keep learning, take a few chances here and there, and stick with his guns, slow though they may be. But we live in such a fast-food society, if someone doesn't *hit* it right away, we get impatient and toss them aside.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 05:10 am (UTC)We need to do what we think is right and how we think we should do it. I say "fuck it" to everyone that thinks we are wrong.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 03:01 am (UTC)