One Mary Sue is much like another
Nov. 21st, 2008 07:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
You know, if you're a fan of a "forbidden couple" in your own favorite fandom, I would think the very last thing you would want to do is point and laugh and make fun of teenage girls who love the lead couple in "Twilight."
And anyone who wants to go to the movie to do nothing but point and laugh? Wait a couple of months until it's at the dollar theater. Better yet, wait to rent the DVD. Or buy the book and scream with laughter at home. Let the girls go get their fun out of it first - they're not paying $10 to listen to your "witticisms" and cutting remarks about their taste or relative intelligence. It's an escape - it may not be Chaucer, but it's what they enjoy. I don't believe I would enjoy the books or the movie based on what I've read, but I wouldn't shell out my own money to deliberately ruin somebody else's theatrical experience.
I'm just saying.
And anyone who wants to go to the movie to do nothing but point and laugh? Wait a couple of months until it's at the dollar theater. Better yet, wait to rent the DVD. Or buy the book and scream with laughter at home. Let the girls go get their fun out of it first - they're not paying $10 to listen to your "witticisms" and cutting remarks about their taste or relative intelligence. It's an escape - it may not be Chaucer, but it's what they enjoy. I don't believe I would enjoy the books or the movie based on what I've read, but I wouldn't shell out my own money to deliberately ruin somebody else's theatrical experience.
I'm just saying.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 03:01 am (UTC)My other friend lended me the book, I'll let you know how that goes.
But no matter what, my "witticisms," will be safely ensconced in my head until I'm out of earshot, you can believe that.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 03:26 am (UTC)I'm not even going to bother with the movie, no matter how unintentionally funny it might be. It'll be on Sky Movies in the next ten or so months, I can wait (and even then I might not watch it).
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 03:47 am (UTC)I'm starting to feel sorry for the few I know who like the books, because some of the reviews for the movie don't sound very promising. I think one said that the actors playing the vampires didn't look like attractive, potentially lethal beings, but actors who had simply fallen into a lot of pancake makeup. Sounds to me like the movie is going to be yet another case of fans saying, "The book(s) was(were) MUCH better," when they leave the theatre.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 04:48 am (UTC)In other news I ONLY JUST FOUND OUT THE VAMPIRES SPARKLE. WTF?! Seriously?! What? SPARKLE?!
Twilight has broken my caps and my ?!. And I barely know anything about it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:54 am (UTC)I don't mind poking fun. I just don't think deliberately going to something you're going to catcall the whole time is the way to go, where there are other fans who genuinely like it. (Not unless it ends up a cult hit like Rocky Horror or something.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 06:37 am (UTC)The leading dude doesn't match my ideal of male beauty either, so it has no redeeming value to me. *is shallow* ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:59 am (UTC)Yeah, even if I found the lead actor attractive, I would just feel weird about it. He's way too young for me.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:18 am (UTC)I still didn't make it through the whole clip. I saw insufficient sparkle.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 09:27 am (UTC)To all of these whiny, bitchy, crazy people:
Boo-freaking-hoo. Cry me a river and drown yourself in it. Please. I'm so goddamn sick of hearing the term Sparrabeth and all your little bitches about every little thing. You're kind of like the current Republican party. Not everyone in your group is bad, but you few that are (such as the Neo-Cons in the Republican party) are SO bad that you're giving all others a bad name.
Love,
Me
Sorry. I went to see the movie tonight and the theater was PACKED. And if I'd paid that much to squeeze myself into a space too small for a human being to fit in between two other humans in the same predicament for 2 1/2 hours and I'd had someone(s) start bitching all the way through it, I might've had to kill them. You know, just cause. *G*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 04:27 pm (UTC)"Twilight" I could care less about - I'm glad you found somebody else to go with (or not) because I think "Harold and Kumar" is about my limit of seeing things I don't like just for you. :-P And at least it had NPH.
(Good job on qualifying the "Republican" remark, BTW. I don't want any wars starting in here.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 05:53 pm (UTC)When I sit here, really thinking what kind of a person would pay money to be able to purposely, maliciously ruin other people's day and possibly an experience they've actually nervously waited for, I honestly hope I'll never meet that person.
I don't pretend to understand that kind of behaviour even when it's free of charge, but it just goes over my head completely when there's money in the equation.
Is it some sort of feeling of superiority that people get from that kind of behaviour? Is it that somehow other person's likes and dislikes are less meaningful, and should actually be stomped on and killed with fire, in comparison to the bullies' fancies?
Then, well...Imagine, if you will, a young couple going to have sex for the first time, one of them might even still be a virgin; Everything's going smoothly, it's romantic and nice and safe and all they could ever ask for, and suddenly this guy in a clown suit jumps through the window with a magnifying glass and a balloon that has 'LOL' printed on it, and starts to sing "Look! LOOK! Look how small it is! You couldn't catch fish with that! And would you look at those strech marks and that flab!", and it doesn't stop before daddy comes in with a shotgun, and you don't really know which part of it all is actually worse.
Ok, maybe not the most everyday example, but still; What's in it for the clown?
Serious question.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:35 am (UTC)See, this is why we can't have nice things.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 12:25 am (UTC)There are people loudly proclaiming they plan to do this in theaters? I hope they get bounced out the doors (as should anyone willfully creating a disturbance in a theater with any other paying customers). Based on what little I know of the book (a delightfully twisted analysis pointing out its basis in Mormonism - somewhere here on lj), I couldn't be less interested in seeing the movie. (If that analysis was even the tiniest bit accurate, I'm sure I'd laugh my ass off or be fuming mad through the whole thing.)
But, if I were the least bit attracted to the male lead I'd be the first in line. Just sayin'. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 04:30 am (UTC)The male lead does nothing for me. In fact, I sadly have the opposite reaction. Right after "ewww, way too young."
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 12:47 am (UTC)The movie sounds like it might be kind of fun to watch on a rainy Sunday when it turns up on Basic Cable, a few years from now. It sounds like they managed to largely sweep aside the epic fail of Meyer's writing.
It's actually disappointing to me that there's this cool new thing out, and it's so lame.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-23 01:00 am (UTC)