My beef is less about her examining it than about her poorly-drawn and stated "conclusions." Where's the research material? Where's her interviews and statistics and sources? Because her descriptions don't fit the slash *I* regularly read; in fact, a rather small percentage of it (and some I've never seen in all my years of reading - like a gay character "turned straight" - where?). What serious scholar/academic would accept THIS as depth research?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:30 am (UTC)