veronica_rich (
veronica_rich) wrote2011-07-05 07:00 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Anthony verdict
OK, Florida fen (and others, I suppose) - I kept up almost not at all with the whole Casey Anthony thing, aside from having heard her and her daughter's name once in a while in the news the past few years. (Yeah, you might think this hard to do, but I assure you, there's plenty else in the news to occupy me, since watching certain other topics is sort of part of my job.)
What do you think about today's acquittal?
What do you think about today's acquittal?
no subject
That being said, nearly every reaction I've seen/heard so far has been in anger over the verdict. Frankly I think it's bogus as well. From the few details I've heard of the case it seemed to me like she killed her daughter.
(no subject)
no subject
It seems probable that she killed her daughter, but there was not enough evidence to prove it. Moreover, I wonder whether, if they *had* proved it she would not have had basis for a mistrial given the obsessive coverage with various talking heads hammering home "Guilty guilty guilty" even as they admitted there was not sufficient evidence.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The prosecution never proved their case and attempted to rely on innuendo and the media. If this case proved anything, it's that the system CAN work.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
What is it with you reporters that won't take no for an answer? What part of 'the jury doesn't want to talk to the press' did they not get? They badgered the court rep at the press conference for half an hour, and multiple helicopters followed their van. WTF? The media is full of nosy ass douchebsgs.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
What really disturbed me was a video I watched that happened before the verdict. It was an analysis of the closing arguments and the "strategies" the prosecustion should have used. It was basically, "find three major points and get those across succinctly, and go for the emotion. A child died, and someone must be blamed. Someone must pay." That was the gist of it.
And while I don't doubt that this sort of thing takes place in trials everywhere, to hear it spelled out like it was nothing more than a football game made me sick. Forget facts, go for the emotion. That's how you WIN.
(no subject)