veronica_rich: (fanfic URL)
veronica_rich ([personal profile] veronica_rich) wrote2010-05-11 02:08 pm

fanfic diatribe

By now most of you have likely heard about writer Diana Gabaldon's screed against fanfic writers as thieves and rapists cutting into her sales by writing fanfic about her characters. (Which I found pretty funny, since the only book of hers I ever bought I bought because of a crossover-with-POTC fanfic I read about one of her characters. I'd never heard of her or her characters prior to that. Well, she won't have to worry about me spending my thieving cash on any of the other books in the series, I assure her - not that I would have anyway, I wasn't terribly impressed with what I read).

[livejournal.com profile] pir8fancier, who is also a published author, says it all right here. My favorite part is at the end, which I will quote thusly: An artist needs to understand that fanfiction is an expression of admiration, of solidarity with other people who share their love of your concept. This is not a backdoor attempt to steal your readers. THESE ARE YOUR READERS.

That this is not OBVIOUS to an author (TV writer, filmmaker, any creator) in this day and age boggles me. IT'S FREE PUBLICITY, YOU NARROW-SIGHTED GITS. YOU GET SALES OFF OF THIS THAT YOU WOULDN'T OTHERWISE. Fanfic writers have been around for centuries; some have even been paid for their efforts (Laurie R. King, Carole Nelson Douglas, J.J. Abrams, William Shakespeare).

[identity profile] immortal-jedi.livejournal.com 2010-05-11 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I know exactly what you mean. I've been introduced to so many books, movies, and tv series thanks to fanfiction and crossovers. Including, but not limited to: Discworld, Harry Potter, The Sentinel, and even Supernatural to some extent.

I don't get it. If I'm ever a published writer, I'm going to encourage fanfiction, though I won't read ff of my own work.

[identity profile] pixelinfandom.livejournal.com 2010-05-11 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
DG has since deleted her diatribe which, oh well. What's almost worse, is how she's posted a 'NO FANFIC PLZ' note on her webpage and right underneath it is a whole entire post about how she based her main character on a Dr. Who character, and got to be on TV about it, and sent the actor books. I don't even....WTF is wrong with her?

http://66.147.244.179/~dianagab/

Almost all media I've spent money on in the past 4 years or so has been purchased directly or indirectly because of fandom. DG will never see a cent of mine, that's for sure.

[identity profile] yoiebear.livejournal.com 2010-05-11 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm in total agreement.
I would be honored if I were a published author and people started writing fanfic about it. It would mean that not only is my work being read, but also inspiring others.

I guess I'm not from the DG/Anne Rice school of thought.

[identity profile] solitaryraven.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Haha. I love this. I've been a fan of Diana's work for a long time and continue to be--she's given me some of my favorite characters ever. However, reading her comments on the forum she posts on has made me loathe her as a person. While I continue to read her books because of how much I love the characters, my love and respect for her as a writer is completely gone. She's incredibly rude, arrogant, and full of herself. Her opinions are the only ones that matter and everyone else is just stupid or useless. I love how she has so much negative publicity because she opened her mouth and showed everyone what an opinionated bitch she really is. Does she have the right to say that she would prefer if people didn't write fanfic about her books? Sure. They're her characters and there are other authors who have asked that. But to bitch and moan about what heinous people fanfic writers are? Bitch. Especially since writing itself has ALWAYS been about taking things other people have written and using them to write something else. This is just one of the steps in that process.

[identity profile] daasgrrl.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
I'd never heard of her until that rant! What amused me most is the report that she based one of her own characters on a Doctor Who character. And that her fiction is heavy on the explicit smut, even as she's complaining about the same kind of thing in fanfic. Way to lose the high moral ground there XD

[identity profile] moonbeamdancer.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
I'd never heard of this woman until now, and I have no urge to read any of her books, ever. I've got another author I love, that more or less has the same stance on fic and I'm getting tired of her as well. She's got a new series starting next month and I have no urge to read it, and I'm seriously thinking of finishing the series of hers I'm currently reading, (by buying them used off Amazon) and then dropping her.

We know the characters belong to you, there are nicer ways of asking us to not play with them, then by being a bitch...

[identity profile] hippediva.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
*giggle* Y'know, for what it's worth, anyone can leave reviews of Ms. Beyotch's work up at Amazon. *whistles innocently* *G*

[identity profile] day221b.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 03:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for sharing pir8fancier's message. They are absolutely right! Eloquently put, too.
ext_14908: (Tea Party (ashelyfanfic))

[identity profile] venusinchains.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I followed some of that (via metafandom and fandom wank). It wakes you up to the fact that being a 'successful' writer does not rule out ignorance or guarantee fact checking. She seems completely unaware of the disclaimer habit that's consistent across every fandom I've been in. Besides which, Fair Use is still a very gray legal area. And fan fic writers are not the only people using her characters - published and paid reviewers and literary critics will summarize and/or quote from her works liberally, and get paid for it, without her permission or any accompanying recompense to her - all perfectly legal. A crack fic could be classified as parody, also perfectly legal, permission granted or not.

That she missed the facts pir8fancier points out (the love and money that fandom can and does provide) almost makes me feel sorry for her.

It's too bad, really. She was on my 'to read' list. No longer. Though it's just as well, the whole discussion also pointed out her inclusion of 'immoral' sex in her series' - specifically rape - that I'd rather avoid. (And the whole 'character being OBVIOUSLY based on a Doctor Who character/actor' thing? Rolflmao!)