veronica_rich (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
veronica_rich) wrote2008-12-09 08:25 pm
veronica_rich) wrote2008-12-09 08:25 pm
Gee, guess ...
[Error: unknown template qotd]
POTC: Jack/Will (you're surprised?). Fabulous chemistry, great teamwork, and visually pleasing. Nothing wrong with the series' canon pairing of Will/Elizabeth; I can enjoy it onscreen. I just like mine more. *G*
Trek TNG: Data/Yar. No, despite the fact they did the horizontal rhumba once, they were not a canon pairing - there was never a romantic relationship between them. But there should've been; they complemented one another very well, IMO.
A-Team: Face/Murdock. Again with the slash! you say. Actually, throughout my life, most of my 'ships have been het; this and J/W are my only two slash ones. But they're more recent, so that's why I recall them so well. (Plus, I often tend to like canon pairings.)
POTC: Jack/Will (you're surprised?). Fabulous chemistry, great teamwork, and visually pleasing. Nothing wrong with the series' canon pairing of Will/Elizabeth; I can enjoy it onscreen. I just like mine more. *G*
Trek TNG: Data/Yar. No, despite the fact they did the horizontal rhumba once, they were not a canon pairing - there was never a romantic relationship between them. But there should've been; they complemented one another very well, IMO.
A-Team: Face/Murdock. Again with the slash! you say. Actually, throughout my life, most of my 'ships have been het; this and J/W are my only two slash ones. But they're more recent, so that's why I recall them so well. (Plus, I often tend to like canon pairings.)