Um ... my apologies, but I'm just not seeing the hatred in this article. It's definitely an editorial with an opinionated slant, but it's not damning or mean-spirited. It's one writer's opinion, and it is credited as such. And the writer is hardly alone for raising the question about Clinton's appearance and image - analysts of Kerry after his loss questioned what might've been if he'd come down harder on his critics, faster. Analysts of Huckabee and Romney wondered if their religious fervor might have hurt them.
I confess ignorance. What am I missing?
And, it's a female writer. I'm certainly not going to cop to the "women can't be misogynists" line, because it's not true (Ann Coulter? Michelle Malkin?), but I have to admit that reading this from a female writer probably makes it more palatable to me, than from a male writer.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 07:10 am (UTC)I confess ignorance. What am I missing?
And, it's a female writer. I'm certainly not going to cop to the "women can't be misogynists" line, because it's not true (Ann Coulter? Michelle Malkin?), but I have to admit that reading this from a female writer probably makes it more palatable to me, than from a male writer.